Qualitative Methodology Review of Australian Homeless Essay

Qualitative Methodology Review of Australian Homeless - Essay Example This paper will discuss the meaning of homelessness, its implication and importance of understanding homelessness. It will also explore and analyse the different research methods used and how the research was approached focussing on the choice of research method and why the method was used. It will try to identify the data collection and analysis used. This paper will try to identify why and how the chosen methods were effective. It will also try to point out the themes, language and focus arguments involving homelessness sin Australia. Homelessness, according to Robinson (2003) means lack of belonging which has grown into a significant social issue. Homelessness can be attributed to the status of an individual, from children to elderly population in a given territory or location with regards to shelter. An individual may be temporarily homeless or can be homeless for a long time. Those who are considered homeless in a temporary manner are the stowaways or teens who ran away from home due to family problems. They may be couch-surfing with friends’ homes. There are also young adults who may be temporarily homeless due to partner problems. In a report prepared by Homelessness Australia, it was estimated that about 105,000 people are homeless across Australia. It was suggested by the report that about 7,483 families with children are without home among them. More striking about the report was that about 12,133 are children or ages 12 or below. About 1 in 39 children under 5 years of age were provided homeless service the previous year. About 27.2 percent are Aboriginal and Torres Strait islander children, but the report also cited that 2 in 3 children are turned away for homeless services (Homelessness Australia, 2010). The Council to Homeless Persons presented several reasons why individuals become homeless including youths aged 12 to 24. Reasons include the breakdown of the family or a relationship,

Ronald Ernest Paul Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Ronald Ernest Paul - Essay Example He was criticizing the same Congress in which he was part of it. Many critics observed that the critics from Paul were meant for individual benefits especially as campaign tools. He was quoted in his speech saying, â€Å"I think Congress is about 20 years behind† (Ron Paul’s Speech). In his speech ,he dwelt on the on the need to critically articulate the issues related to foreign and domestic strategy issues, which he said they negatively impacted on the economy and he said the country was headed to a worst economy crisis. It is ironical that Ron Paul’s criticism was on the same congress, which he is part of. He is one of the unsuccessful members of the congress, yet he appears the top critic. Ronald Ernest â€Å"Ron† Paul is one of the renowned United States Congressman and emerged to be repeat presidential candidature, having contented for the presidency in 1988, 2008, and 2012. In the year 1988, he was presidential candidate for Libertarian Party in the 12 years break in the years when he was Republican Congressman. In 2008, Ronald Ernest was presidential nominee for Republican Party. He believes on the supremacy of the Constitution and he never proposes a bill to be approved in the Congress, unless it is provided in the constitution. He is presently contesting for presidency under the nomination for Republican Party in the United States (Schoen & Rasmussen 102). ... 8 contestation for presidency under Republican Party, he has been the chief architect behind advocacy movement Campaign for Liberty and his ideas has been evidence in his speeches, journals, and books. He has become a leading critic in the aspect of civil liberties, gay marriage, taxation policies, foreign policies, health care, entitlements, and abortion. Paul has the believe and understanding that liberties in the market , reducing business regulations and lowering taxes will boost the market strategies ,as well as promoting favorable business environment . According to him, these aspects will have positive impacts on the economy of the United States and also increase employment opportunities within the market environment. He is the chief critic on Federal Reserve, arguing that this will present serious implications on the economy of the country. He said in his speech while in Michigan University addressing students that this will lead to the aspect of bust and boom leading to fina ncial crisis both in the United States and in the global platform. The boom and bust within the economy will promote unethical business practices (Schoen & Rasmussen 89). In his speech he said that, â€Å"The federal government does a lousy job providing the atmosphere necessary to be competitive and be able to compete around the world because they overtax and they over regulateâ€Å". In his entire speech in Michigan, he put more emphasizes on the element of abolishing the Federal Reserve ,an economic entity that he argued that is guilty of collapsing the U.S dollar value and obstructing ,not assisting ,the U.S economy. He said in his speech that the labor policies should be revisited by the Congress where he advocated for a countrywide Right to work policy (Schoen & Rasmussen 123). . He said

Levels of Leadership

Levels of Leadership Leadership synthesis Pioneers today are overwhelmed with data all day, every day. The unpredictability can overpower. However, pioneers should rally partners with savvy examinations of issues and plans for how to succeed. Equity Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. talked about the significance of getting to the effortlessness on the opposite side of intricacy. Such straightforwardness quickens speed and drives change. By what means can pioneers today get to that effortlessness? This test is one of the combination. Union inventively combines numerous components, regularly from various zones, into something new and important. The combination is not a rundown. Blend takes A + B + C and afterward determines D, where D envelops the embodiment of A, B, and C additionally includes something new that resounds profoundly with individuals. O.J Simpsons lawyer, Johnny Cochran, integrated an unpredictable trial with the notorious words to the jury, If it doesnt fit, you should indicate. Combination streamlines and clarifies. The individuals who incorporate can touch individuals profoundly. Amalgamation is a capable and fundamental authority expertise. At Gettysburg amid the Civil War, government official and teacher Edward Everett represented more than two hours amid his indulgent address. People were confounded by the savage war, so clarifying the need and setting was essential, however, hours of pontificating were not what the general population required. President Abraham Lincoln then nailed it in around two minutes in his Gettysburg Address with expressions like, we here exceptionally settle that these dead should not have kicked the bucket futile, and legislature of the general population, by the general population, for the general population, might not die from the earth. In a February 2006 Harvard Business Review article, clinician Howard Gardner stated, The capacity to choose what data to notice, what to disregard, and how to sort out and convey what we judge to be critical is turning into a center competency for those living in the created world. The blend is not something intrinsic in a skilled few. The blend is an educated attitude that you can race, yet there are a couple of bits of knowledge into how pioneers can orchestrate. Here we list seven stages you can figure out how to have the capacity to combine adequately as a pioneer: Immersion. To integrate, you should jump into all that muddled intricacy, listening and perusing unquenchable to see profoundly. Sorting. At that point youll need to sort data, figuring out what is significant, disposing of non-tenable information, and burrowing under manifestations to get the chance to underlying drivers. Patterns. You can then be gathering the pertinent data into examples. Stepping Back. Next, you venture back and take a gander at the examples. Is there a legitimate or convincing topic that appears to rule? Drafting. At that point, you draft an unmistakable, basic, capable message that catches the eminent topic. A rundown sound chomp or slogan is helpful. Winston Churchill combined the respectable fearlessness of the Royal Air Force in the Battle of Britain, constraining Germany to cross out its arranged attack, with, Never in the field of the human clash was such a great amount of owed by such many to so few. Feedback. Presently attempt your draft out on proficient and trusted associates who have the mettle to let you know reality. You may need to circle back a few circumstances between these means to get the last form. Present. At long last, you show the union to more extensive gatherings of people, modifying as you listen and learn. An ideal approach to figure out how to combine is to hone these means. Take main problems from your work, or in the news, and take the means above. Start with issues that are not very intricate and work your way up from that point. Core Concept: Synthesis is an effective administration attitude that anybody can learn with practice. APPLICATION OF LEADERSHIP: The initiative has been viewed as a standout amongst essential segments in the achievement of associations. Maccabee (1979) closed from his perceptions that the need of firms to survive and succeed in a universe of expanding rivalry, of innovative advances, of changing legislative directions, of changing laborer dispositions, requires a more elevated amount of initiative than at any other time (p. 313). At the point when associations encounter transform, it is basic that their authoritative administration is sufficient to meet the test. Authority application bit by bit developed all through history. In the United States amid the twentieth century, various examinations helped with the assessment of the significance of initiative in associations. In the vicinity of 1971 and 1981, Katz cell and Gusto (1983) presumed that supervisory strategies appeared to be especially compelling in expanding yield (Bass, 1990, p.8). In 1974, Hansen remarked that Ford Motor Company could close a plant w ithout irritating or migrating staff. The accomplishment of that move was ascribed to the use of successful authority. Military triumphs likewise have been credited to the exceptional initiative application. Administration has been viewed as a basic figure military victories since records have been kept; that is better-driven powers more than once have been successful over inadequately driven strengths (Bass, 1990, p.9). A pioneers solitary occupation is to get comes about. Be that as it may, even with all the administration preparing projects and master counsel accessible, viable initiative still escapes many individuals and associations. One reason, says Daniel Goleman, is that such specialists offer exhortation in view of deduction, experience, and intuition, not on quantitative information. Presently, drawing on the research of more than 3,000 officials, Goleman investigates which exact administration practices yield positive outcomes. He plots six particular administration styles, everyone springing from various segments of enthusiastic knowledge. Every style distinctly affects the working climate of an organization, division, or group, and, thusly, on its money related execution. The styles, by name and brief portrayal alone, will impact any individual leads identity, driven, or, just like the case with the vast majority of us, does both. Coercive pioneers request quick consistency. Legitimate pioneers assemble individuals toward a dream. Affiliative pioneers make passionate bonds and agreement. Fair pioneers manufacture accord through investment. Pacesetting pioneers expect incredibleness and self-course. Furthermore, drilling pioneers create individuals for whats to come. The examination shows that pioneers who get the best outcomes dont depend on only one authority style; they utilize the greater part of the styles in any given week. Goleman points of interest the sorts of business circumstances every style is most appropriate for, and he clarifies how pioneers who need at least one styles can extend their repertories. He keeps up what rehearse pioneers can switch among administration styles to create intense outcomes, accordingly transforming the specialty of authority into a science. 5 level of Leadership: Level 1: Highly Capable Individual: At this level, you make great commitments with your work. You have valuable levels of information, and you have the ability and aptitudes expected to make a decent showing with regards to. Level 2: Contributing team member: At Level 2, you utilize your insight and attitudes to help your group succeed. You work viable, beneficially and effectively with other individuals in your gathering. Level 3: Competent Manager Here, youre ready to compose a gathering adequately to accomplish objectives and targets. Level 4: Effective Leader Level 4 is the classification that most top pioneers fall into. Here, youre ready to excite an office or association to meet execution goals and accomplish a dream. Level 5: Great Leader At Level 5, you have most the capacities required for the other four levels, in addition to you have the extraordinary mix of quietude and will that is required for genuine significance. How to become a level 5 leader: It requires investment and pushes to wind up distinctly a Level 5 Leader. In any case, the uplifting news is that it should be possible, particularly on the off chance that you have the energy to attempt. Once more, understand that you dont need to advance through every level thusly keeping in mind the end goal to get the opportunity to Level 5. In any case, you do require the abilities found in every level with a specific end goal to accomplish Level 5 status. Here are a few methodologies that will help you develop candidly and professionally, with the goal that you can build up the characteristics of a Level 5 Leader. References http://triplecrownleadership.com/synthesis-a-critical-leadership-skill/ https://hbr.org/2005/07/level-5-leadership-the-triumph-of-humility-and-fierce-resolve

paper on mills -- essays research papers

I decided to write my paper on Mill for two main reasons. The first deals with happiness and virtue and his take on these things. I would first off like to state my disagreements with his ideas and then I will speak of my agreements. Mill contends that a less intelligent individual can not be as happy as one with a greater intellectual capacity. He also states that you would not be happy as swine even if everything you desired was given. I disagree. I feel that if you do not know of what you do not have then you cannot miss it. If we were less intelligent then we would be more content with the more primal needs that our ancestors had. If their needs were met then they were happy. Can we say the same for ourselves? Even if I had everything I ever wanted I could not be as happy as a caveman who had a mate, good hunting grounds and a full stomach. They had no one to worry about except protecting their clan. Yet we as a more civilized culture have much more to concern ourselves with. We must not only worry about ourselves and our families but also our neighbors and communities. If a caveman was considered virtuous it was because he was a good protector and provider and could be relied upon by his clan, yet for a man to now be considered virtuous it takes almost the same but this goal is much harder to achieve. I do feel like Mill that to live virtuously is a goal that we should all strive to attain and like him I believe that these acts will not bring about happiness as an end but by acting in such a manner will contribute to your overall happiness exponentially. I also like the fact that that if something should bring about your happiness then it is ok to try and achieve it such as money. He does not say it is wrong to try and get as much money as you can and he says it is ok if it is a means to an end for bringing you happiness. Money will buy many of our desires and wishes and for many it is there main goal in life and yet for others obtaining the money itself is there goal. That alone will bring them happiness as it is there driving force and having enough will satisfy them. This in many occasions will make the person noxious to others but not always. We should look at this then that to try and achieve a lot of money but not become noxious and still trying to live virtuously would be a cceptable. That is not necessarily everyone’s goal who hopes to acquire... ... say I do not care if my child is sick and needs to go to the doctor I want a new pair of shoes and do not have enough money to do both? No it is unthought-of (At least for those with any morals or virtues). These are simple to deduct but what about when we face times of war? Who decides who is sacrificed then? Is it right of them to make such decisions? I say yes. If we have placed these people in a position of authority then they have that right because we have placed our trust in them to act in a manner that will be for the good of our community. It then becomes our right to make this sacrifice. If we do not then someone else must take our place. Then we have not only acted wrongly but we have shirked our duty to our community and placed someone else’s life at risk for our own cowardice or selfishness. Therefore the good of the community should be sacrificed for, and those in charge should be able to make those decisions based on the trust we placed in them when they re ceived those positions. I will sum this up by stating that living virtuously, morally and by willing to sacrifice for the greater good sum up most of Mill’s philosophy all of which I agree with wholeheartedly.

Assignment #2 †Zale Jewelers Flop at the High End Essay

1.What do you think will be the effectiveness of Burton returning Zales Jewelers to its regular business strategy? In your answer, define or categorize that strategy. I think that Burton returning the Zales Jewelers to its regular business strategy will bring back the company from the decline it was facing with Forte as CEO. The business strategy Forte had in mind was cutting the customers Zales had tremendously. For years Zales has always been seen a specific brand with focus on diamond rings and jewelry and their customers go to them because of that. Bringing back Zales to its regular business strategy will help in terms of the operational effectiveness. They will be able to sell their products value. Burton will use a business-level strategy which will focus on product differentiation, focus and cost leadership. This strategy will help the company get back from the Forte’s disaster of a strategy. The product differentiation will offer products to customers that cannot be found in any of their competitor’s stores. Having unique diamond jewelry and being able to afford it will attract new and old Zales customers. Focus strategy focuses on a specific buyer market. Knowing your brand and who your intended focus will be on is important for a company. When I hear Zales I get images of diamonds, engagement rings, and jewelry. Focusing on these points will help the business strategy. Lastly, cost leadership is providing a product at a low cost which will give the company a gain in market share. Zales cuts prices on holidays which bring in more business and helps in terms of their suppliers. I think that bringing back Zales to how it use to be, to the diamond store everyone knows it to be will drive sales up. Once the business strategy is properly thought out where they know what key areas to focus on they will have no problems in terms of appeal to customers. 2.What should Burton do about the ethical and legal problems facing Zales? Burton should take care of the ethical and legal problems facingI think that Burton should use the functional-level strategy where you find and   retain the best people. Legal problems can lead a company down the wrong road and potentially injure them financially. Ethical behavior within a company is very important. It could be the difference between a company being successful and getting sued. As for Burton I think that she should first focus on finding a highly competent person that will behave ethically. Also she should implement new and stricter policies, procedures and rules everyone (even high level executives) should follow. The policies will

Explain how and why compromises preserved the union until the southern states decided to leave the union in 1861?

Civil war within the United States was inevitable; the question was when it was going to happen. The issue of slavery was big enough to separate the country culturally and politically, civil war was bound to happen, in fact, it’s amazing it was avoided for so long. The single most important reason war was averted for so long was the many compromises made in the years prior that attempted to keep the southerns and northerns content in the house and senate.However, with a country in the midst of major territory expansion, population increase, and technological advancements, the days of a united nation were numbered. Conflicts over slavery will intensify with expansion, abolitionism, sectionalism, and issues over states rights. To settle these conflicts, compromises such as the 3/5 compromise, Missouri compromise, compromise of 1850 and the fugitive slave act, and the Kansas-Nebraska act were made. Daniel Webster speaks on behalf of a united nation that succession will destroy ou r country (doc B).When the compromise of 1850 is issued to settle the dispute over California being admitted as a free of slave state, The Fugitive Slave Act accompanies it to make sure that the southerns get something out of it too and don’t feel cheated (doc O). This act states â€Å"That when a person held to service or labor†¦ shall escape into another state†¦ may pursue and reclaim such fugitive person†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (doc C) This allowed peace to be held between the northern and southerns. Abolitionists were extremists who believed slavery should be abolished.Among those, the very famous and feared John Brown is probably most recognizable. He went on a killing streak, handing out weapons to slaves and hated by the southerns and most northerns as well (doc P). He believed that war was the only answer to keeping a united nation as evident in his last words, â€Å" I John Brown am now quite certain that the crimes of this guilty land: will never be purged away; b ut by blood. † (doc F). An attempt by a northern named David Wilmot to keep slavery out of the newly acquired territories from Mexico was presented to the House and Senate in the Wilmot Proviso.It states â€Å" Acquisition of any territory from the republic of Mexico by the United States†¦ neither slavery nor involuntary servitude shall ever in any part of said territory†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (doc M). However it never passes the Senate, which was heavily dominated by southerns. Many states pass laws that prevent any persons from speaking out or publishing anything against slavery or the abolition of slavery or any thing that would spark rebellion in slaves. The federal government over looked this even though it was in contrast to the constitution because it was thought to help keep the southerns from succession (doc L).In 1860, shortly before the war started, the Republicans dominated the House and Senate (doc Q). This obviously was a key reason for the democrats to escape the u nion and start the confederate states. Plus, the southerns believed is states’ rights and that they should be able to do with their states what they wanted, a evident in Franklin Pierce’s speech when he says, â€Å" I believe that the constituted authorities of this Repubic are bound to regard the rights of the South in this respect as they would view any other legal and constitutional right.† (doc H).In 1861, of course, is the beginning of the civil war. With too much tension and hatred between the northerns and southerns, it was time for it to happen. The compromises could only hold for so long, the population differences between the north and south were too big to never interfere with the sides.